Blog

Proposed Missouri silica sand mine loses appeal of its denied permit • Missouri Independent

Ste. Genevieve County residents have been fighting efforts by NexGen Mining Inc. to mine silica in their county (Niara Savage/Missouri Independent).

A plan to build a silica mine in southeast Missouri suffered yet another setback on Tuesday when an appeals court ruled state regulators were within their authority to deny the project a permit.  Kaolin Clay

Proposed Missouri silica sand mine loses appeal of its denied permit • Missouri Independent

The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District sided with the Missouri Mining Commission, which denied NexGen Silica a permit in January because it submitted an incomplete application. 

“NexGen’s permit application did not identify all parties with any interest in the land and did not contain the written consent of all parties prior to approval of the mining permit by (the Missouri Department of Natural Resources),” the unanimous ruling says.

NexGen Silica had planned to mine silica sand, which is commonly used for fracking, near Hawn State Park in Ste Genevieve County. News of the project sparked blowback in the community. Residents feared the operation would kick up toxic sand, pollute their drinking water and keep the community up all night with bright lights and traffic.

But NexGen has struggled to obtain — and keep — permits for the project. 

Residents ask Missouri legislators to halt silica mine, don’t want ‘our futures ruined’

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources initially granted NexGen a land reclamation permit last year despite the missing information in its application that the appeals court noted in its Tuesday ruling. 

But Operation Sand, a group formed by residents near the proposed mine, challenged the permit, arguing it was incomplete and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources hadn’t adequately scrutinized the application. 

Operation Sand prevailed. The state’s Administrative Hearing Commission recommended the decision to grant NexGen a permit be reversed, and the Missouri Mining Commission followed suit. NexGen appealed that decision, resulting in Tuesday’s denial.

Jillian Ditch Anslow, who helped establish Operation Sand, said in a press release that the organization formed to protect residents from the potential health effects of silica sand mining. She said she was thankful the appeals court affirmed the denial of the permit.

“Ste. Genevieve County is abundant with natural resources, including clean air, clean drinking water, as well as Hawn State Park, and all these deserve to be protected,” she said.

NexGen’s attorney did not immediately return an email seeking comment. A NexGen employee’s email had seemingly stopped functioning, and the company’s website was offline.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the company would try again to obtain a permit.

In May, the company wrote to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources to withdraw its request for a water permit, which was also challenged by Operation Sand. 

Operation Sand’s attorney, Stephen Jeffery, said his clients would be happy to hear the appeals court’s decision.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

At the same time, NexGen is suing Ste Genevieve County over a law prohibiting new mines close to schools, towns, churches and other sites important to the community and environment. That lawsuit is still pending. 

The proposed mine also attracted criticism last year because the state didn’t require an environmental review before issuing the initial land reclamation permit. 

Residents flooded the Missouri Department of Natural Resources when it allowed public comments on the permit, fearing the mine would harm their drinking water, native wildlife and Hawn State Park.

One person who wrote to the department said: “If there is even a chance of it contaminating our water, using up our water table or affecting anyone’s health (including the wildlife) why allow it? Why chance it? There’s too much at stake here.”

The department said, at that time, that the statute gave the agency little flexibility in whether to decline permit applications. And it doesn’t require an environmental review. 

by Allison Kite, Missouri Independent October 17, 2023

by Allison Kite, Missouri Independent October 17, 2023

A plan to build a silica mine in southeast Missouri suffered yet another setback on Tuesday when an appeals court ruled state regulators were within their authority to deny the project a permit. 

The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District sided with the Missouri Mining Commission, which denied NexGen Silica a permit in January because it submitted an incomplete application. 

“NexGen’s permit application did not identify all parties with any interest in the land and did not contain the written consent of all parties prior to approval of the mining permit by (the Missouri Department of Natural Resources),” the unanimous ruling says.

NexGen Silica had planned to mine silica sand, which is commonly used for fracking, near Hawn State Park in Ste Genevieve County. News of the project sparked blowback in the community. Residents feared the operation would kick up toxic sand, pollute their drinking water and keep the community up all night with bright lights and traffic.

But NexGen has struggled to obtain — and keep — permits for the project. 

Residents ask Missouri legislators to halt silica mine, don’t want ‘our futures ruined’

The Missouri Department of Natural Resources initially granted NexGen a land reclamation permit last year despite the missing information in its application that the appeals court noted in its Tuesday ruling. 

But Operation Sand, a group formed by residents near the proposed mine, challenged the permit, arguing it was incomplete and the Missouri Department of Natural Resources hadn’t adequately scrutinized the application. 

Operation Sand prevailed. The state’s Administrative Hearing Commission recommended the decision to grant NexGen a permit be reversed, and the Missouri Mining Commission followed suit. NexGen appealed that decision, resulting in Tuesday’s denial.

Jillian Ditch Anslow, who helped establish Operation Sand, said in a press release that the organization formed to protect residents from the potential health effects of silica sand mining. She said she was thankful the appeals court affirmed the denial of the permit.

“Ste. Genevieve County is abundant with natural resources, including clean air, clean drinking water, as well as Hawn State Park, and all these deserve to be protected,” she said.

NexGen’s attorney did not immediately return an email seeking comment. A NexGen employee’s email had seemingly stopped functioning, and the company’s website was offline.

It wasn’t immediately clear whether the company would try again to obtain a permit.

In May, the company wrote to the Missouri Department of Natural Resources to withdraw its request for a water permit, which was also challenged by Operation Sand. 

Operation Sand’s attorney, Stephen Jeffery, said his clients would be happy to hear the appeals court’s decision.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

At the same time, NexGen is suing Ste Genevieve County over a law prohibiting new mines close to schools, towns, churches and other sites important to the community and environment. That lawsuit is still pending. 

The proposed mine also attracted criticism last year because the state didn’t require an environmental review before issuing the initial land reclamation permit. 

Residents flooded the Missouri Department of Natural Resources when it allowed public comments on the permit, fearing the mine would harm their drinking water, native wildlife and Hawn State Park.

One person who wrote to the department said: “If there is even a chance of it contaminating our water, using up our water table or affecting anyone’s health (including the wildlife) why allow it? Why chance it? There’s too much at stake here.”

The department said, at that time, that the statute gave the agency little flexibility in whether to decline permit applications. And it doesn’t require an environmental review. 

Missouri Independent is part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Missouri Independent maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Jason Hancock for questions: info@missouriindependent.com. Follow Missouri Independent on Facebook and Twitter.

Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site. Please see our republishing guidelines for use of photos and graphics.

Allison Kite is a data reporter for The Missouri Independent and Kansas Reflector, with a focus on energy, the environment and agriculture. A graduate of the University of Kansas, she previously covered City Hall for The Kansas City Star, as well as state government in both Topeka and Jefferson City.

The Missouri Independent is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization dedicated to relentless investigative journalism and daily reporting that sheds light on state government and its impact on the lives of Missourians. This service is free to readers and other news outlets.

DEIJ Policy | Ethics Policy | Privacy Policy

Proposed Missouri silica sand mine loses appeal of its denied permit • Missouri Independent

Low Calorie Dog Treats Our stories may be republished online or in print under Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND 4.0. We ask that you edit only for style or to shorten, provide proper attribution and link to our web site.